25 Replies to “Mardy Fish – Andy Murray ATP Masters Cincinnati 2010 3rd set tiebreaker”

  1. @Gipshaw Mardys a great player but he is not gonna win wimbledon. Unfortunately he probably won’t win any slam. But who knows what he could have done if he lost the weight earlier in his career.

  2. @Rafathaman94
    Mardy Fish owns all.
    Watch, as he wins his first Grand Slam at Wimbledon this year.

  3. @shadowsong16
    I don’t see how his on-court attitude is any different from Djokovic’s….well, besides the swearing. lol

  4. @shadowsong16 Agree. Murray has improved his PR qualities since his teens, but there’s still a lot to be wanting and he’ll probably always be lightyears behind Fed, Nadal, Djokovic, and Roddick in that aspect. Yes he’s spoiled, his country has invested grotesque amounts of money in him hoping he’ll produce slams but so far down the crapper. Guy’s got like a coach for everything: Strategy coach, psychological coach, forehand coach, backhand coach, drop shot coach, hahaha!

  5. @VerdascoFan Yes, Fish is playing better than Roddick at the moment. Fish has a great chance to get into the top 15 or top 10 if he plays this consistently.

  6. @Rafathaman94 Fish has been injured and is making a comeback. He’s improved his fitness and FH. His style of play gives Murray a lot of trouble (btw it gives A LOT of players trouble including Fed). Also Fish is really god and a great competitor. with no points to defend for the rest of the yr and after making the rd of 16 and at US Open. DOn’t be surprised to see him take roddick’s olace as sole american in the top 10. I think he’s def finishing top 12.

  7. Mardy has def. improved his fitness and tennis.He can compete with the top players. We want to see Murray get a grand slam, but his attitude makes me shakes my head.

  8. @shadowsong16 lol yea, It’s bad enough the way Murray was behaving recently, but now without a coach, Murray is starting to revert back to his younger form, when he was even more brattier and defensive. The cap show it all.

  9. @ArjunJethwa FOURTH Comment Response: Of course Murray is better than Fish! That’s not my point. My point is that it must be embarrasing for Murray to lose 3 straight matches to a nobody like Fish. It feels terrible to lose to the same person 3 times in 1 year. Just look at Nadal and Del Potro last year. At least Del Potro is a consistent top 10 player. Murray lost 3 times to a player that hasn’t even made it into the top 15.

  10. @ArjunJethwa Third Comment Response: lol If Murray played like Federer did, then I’d stop watching tennis. Even if Murray does win something (which I highly doubt) people like me will still hate him because of his attitude on the court and the person that he is.

  11. @ArjunJethwa Second Comment Response: If Fish has beaten Murray 3 straight times this year, then Fish definitely does not get lucky. And all Murray fans make that excuse in Queens. It was obviously dark enough to suspend play if the officials agreed it was too dark. Even if they consulted Murray, they would have suspended play anyway, because they wouldn’t have agreed on a decision to keep playing or stop. FISH WON! End of story.

  12. @ArjunJethwa Second Comment Response: If Fish was able to beat Murray 3 striaght times this year, then it is definitely not the case that Fish just got lucky. And I am so tired of hearing thatexcuse in Queens. I am sure it must have dark enough to suspend play, if the officials thought so. And even if they did consulted Murray, they still would have suspended the match because they wouldn'[t have agreed on a decision. Fish OUTPLAYED MURRAY. End of story.

  13. @ArjunJethwa Second Comment Response: If Fish was able to beat Murray 3 striaght times this year, then it is definitely not the case that Fish just got lucky. And I am so tired of hearing thatexcuse in Queens. I am sure it must have dark enough to suspend play, if the officials thought so. And even if they did consulted Murray, they still would have suspended the match because they wouldn'[t have agreed on a decision. Fish OUTPLAYED MURRAY. End of story.

  14. @ArjunJethwa Second Comment Response: If Fish was able to beat Murray 3 striaght times this year, then it is definitely not the case that Fish just got lucky. And I am so tired of hearing thatexcuse in Queens. I am sure it must have dark enough to suspend play, if the officials thought so. And even if they did consulted Murray, they still would have suspended the match because they wouldn'[t have agreed on a decision. Fish OUTPLAYED MURRAY. End of story.

  15. @ArjunJethwa First Comment Response: Fed and Murray were both in the final and they both played in Cincy on Wed. So they both got 4 days off. And the only reason why Murray won Toronto was because no one was on their game. And Nole almost beat Federer. He had BP’s to serve for the match. He did play badly in Cincy. And SF and QF for Rafa is a good result for HC tourny’s like these (which he doesn’t care about).

  16. My point is, greater players than Murray in the world have lost matches to lower ranked players before. Do they all behave like brats who think the world robbed them of something significant? No they don’t. So who is Murray to behave this way? Murray got beaten by a better player that day, and he has to accept it. But why can’t he? Because he has a fundamentally flawed personality. But thats just what i think.

Comments are closed.